Letter from the Chair
Shireen Adenwalla
University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE
Happy New Year! Although 2022 is off to a rather rocky start, we can cautiously hope that the latter part of the year allows for in-person conferences, travel and visits to friends and family - in other words, the everyday joys of a somewhat normal life.
2022 is also the 10th Anniversary of FOEP. I asked Dan Dahlberg and Jim Kakalios, both stalwarts of FOEP, for a brief history. Dan Dahlberg, who was actively involved in its creation, recalled that it grew out of an APS committee, the Committee to Inform the Public (CIP). At the time, CIP was a small committee of ~6 members, charged with creating better connections between physicists and the public. The creation of the Forum was an effort to increase these connections by increasing the number of APS members involved in outreach and engagement. The first FOEP Executive Committee, chaired by Paul Chaiken, was formed in 2011. Jim Kakalios recalls being elected as the first Past-Chair "even though I had not been Chair, I was the first Past-Chair. Or rather, the Past-Chair for the first time." (He was past Chair again in 2020! Yay Jim!) Dan was the Secretary/Treasurer till 2021 - clearly FOEP is more than a passing fancy, so this might be another reason for our members to consider running for office. If it wasn't fun, they wouldn't be doing it for so long!
Speaking of stalwarts, Shannon Greco, the past Chair steered FOEP through the worst of the pandemic with calm, tact, and foresight, organizing sessions for the virtual March and April meetings, communicating via flurries of emails, holding a virtual executive meeting, and cheerfully being available for brief communications at odd times. She deserves our collective thanks, and my particular thanks for the document she created outlining the Chair's responsibilities. We first met at the APS Leadership Council meeting in January 2020, in pre-COVID times (sigh!), and found that we had similar visions for FOEP.
The recent omicron surge led to a cancellation of the APS Annual Leadership meeting in the last week of January, a necessary but disappointing development. I had been looking forward to in-person meetings with the new Chair-Elect Roxanne Hughes and the new Secretary/Treasurer, Heide Doss, to discuss FOEP priorities, tactics for increasing membership, and the path forward - and to have a little bit of fun as well. Although virtual meetings are efficient, in-person discussions of tactics, purpose, and even budgets take on a different flavor that virtual meetings fail to replicate.
At this point, both the March and April meetings are set to be in-person meetings with virtual components. We have a strong presence at both meetings, with one invited and one contributed session at each. The invited speakers are a diverse and wide-ranging bunch. Lindsay Olson is an artist specializing in science-inspired art who will bring some of her pieces to show at her talk. Abraham Asfaw is a quantum computationalist and educator and co-developer of QISKIT, an interactive textbook on quantum computing. Kathy DrinkInWater, the Chief Program Office at the American Indian Science and Engineering Society (AISES), will discuss how to increase the representation of Natives in STEM fields. For all the details and information of all the FOEP sessions see the meeting schedule at https://aps.org.
FOEP is also co-sponsoring three public events at the March meeting. There will be a lecture by Diandra Leslie Pelecky on the Physics of NASCAR, an evening of science songs by Nancy Ellen Abram, and a Friday evening outreach event to a local high school, Physics Fiesta. Physics Fiesta emerged via a conversation between the Chair-Elect of DCMP, Smitha Vishveshwaran, Brian Schwartz, and myself out of a common desire to make an impact on local area students. Our thought was that with over 10,000 physicists in Chicago, we have an excellent opportunity to interact with students on their turf. We will have physics-themed demos, rap battles, interpretive dances, and physicists on hand to chat with aspiring STEM majors.
My focus for FOEP in 2022 will be on increasing diversity at all levels: our membership, the executive committee, the outreach and engagement activities we highlight, the speakers we invite and the awards we sponsor. This includes diversity along numerous dimensions including ethnicity, gender, age, urban and rural communities, large wealthy universities, small private colleges, HBCUs, Hispanic serving institutions, and community colleges. There is a wealth of excellent and impactful outreach work that often goes unrecognized because our scattering cross-section is too small. FOEP is a fairly large forum having more than 2000 members; I urge all of you to invite, contact, and search out opportunities to dramatically amplify diverse viewpoints. As the APS statement on diversity states, "The health of physics requires talent from the broadest demographic pool." (https://www.aps.org/policy/statements/08_2.cfm). One of the few bright spots from COVID is how comfortable we have all become with the virtual world. This could have a dramatic impact on the audience for engagement and outreach activities. As always, younger people have more enthusiasm and original ideas on how to navigate the ins and out of the universe of technologies that are now available. This can be seen in the high proportion of student members in FOEP. At 43%, this is higher than most other forums, other than those devoted to early career scientists and graduate students.
One of the risks that younger people face in devoting time to outreach and engagement is that these efforts have traditionally not been given much, if any, weight in hiring, tenure and promotion decisions. A recent statement and white paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.10623) put out by the APS shows the value and benefit of these activities to the institute and to the field of physics in general. The statement reads in part, "APS therefore strongly supports participation in informal education activities, and supports that such participation should be considered in recruiting and promotion decisions, including tenure decisions at universities and other forms of career advancement at non-academic institutions as appropriate." Although institutions are not required to follow these recommendations, they do constitute a strong endorsement of outreach activities.
Here's hoping for a healthy and calm 2022, with face-to-face meetings (one can dream...).
Shireen Adenwalla
Chair
Top